The new 100 Peso note |
Eight years ago when I first visited Argentina in what would
result in an affair that lasts to this day, I was very naïve in what to expect
from a nation that still felt numb after its economic collapse. I will admit
that one of the reasons to visit Buenos Aires was curiosity about what exactly
happened. To be fair the media at home were not particularly concerned with the
economic calamities of a South American country such was the jaded and somewhat
ignorant opinion that these things, like coups or attempted coups were as
prevalent as the seasons in that part of the world. All I knew was that in the
year and a half prior to my arrival Argentina suffered the biggest sovereign
default in history, its currency crashed and with it the savings of a once
wealthy and proud nation were wiped out. To this day, the sight of cartoneros, the newly poor and destitute from
the far edges of this vast city arriving by twilight like economic zombies to
collect the cardboard in the empty evening streets of the financial district,
all the time too proud to ask you for money haunt me.
I had never heard of the term corralito, a word that even today makes the average Argentino spit in
disgust that described the economic measures taken by the desperate government
to prevent the nation falling into economic and political anarchy. Breaking the
one dollar one peso peg that hubristically held that perennial demon inflation
away and underpinned the boom of the 90’s resulted in a peso freefall, wiping
75% off the value of the peso and all peso-denominated wealth. Since then I
have taken a keen interest in the economy of Argentina. Buenos Aires went from
being one of the most expensive cities in the world to one with a cost of
living on par with many African nations. This confirmed the belief many of my Argentino
friends that all the time no matter how wrong they were such was their resignation they in fact lived in a Third World country.
On my second day in Buenos Aires I took a taxi to a
restaurant. For the lengthy trip it came to about 10 pesos or just over 2 euro.
I gave the taxi man a 100 peso note. He looked at me with an expression between
exasperation and horror as if I was a pedophile. Cursing in Spanish he angrily
scowered around for change before without a smile speeding off. In the past 100
pesos amounted to 100 dollars and thus a note of novelty but with the crash it
had become a piece of scorn. Smaller notes became much more needed due to the
devalued peso but became prized. Handing over a 100 peso note back then would
result in angry sighs in shops and restaurants. Yet today it is a completely
different situation and Argentina is a nation in desperate need of new 100 peso
notes that resulted in a new one issued with the revered Evita as it’s face and a rapid increase in print
numbers. What caused this change of events is a particularly Argentino story
that has as its star that old foe: inflation.
Argentina today is a strange yet fascinating country again
for politics and economics lovers. Instrumental in all of this is the person
some see as the contemporary Evita, the current president Cristina Fernandez de
Kirchner, or CFK to many Argentinos. CFK and her husband, the former president
and deceased Nestor rose up from the calamity of 2002 to steer the nation back
on track. Taking a particularly brazen and confrontational approach that gave
them supporters and haters in equal amount, Nestor was rightly successful in
getting a massive write down in international debts for the country.
Former president Nestor at the innauguration of her wife Cristina as president |
However what happened after was more dubious. Fuelled by
revenues from hugely increased international demand for agricultural exports,
Nestor and later Cristina (who won election in 2007 when Nestor stepped down to
prevent the handicap of two-term limits) created a state of clientelism and
largesse, lavishing the country in subsidies for things such as fuel and public
sector wages. To some it was a game of indirect vote-buying or at the very
least an incentive to sectors supportive of the Kirchners to vote for them in
the future. What resulted in this is basic economics. Inflation, although
always there returned to double digits and in a nation long prone to the
erosion of purchasing power by it, the acrimony increased.
To dampen criticism about increased inflation and prices and
move attention to other policies considered more important, Nestor and later
Cristina slowly began to manipulate the board of the independent national
statistics organization INDEC,
thus taking control of the institution and cooking the books. Soon the
organization was posting inflation numbers much lower and certainly lower than what
the average person on the street was seeing in the prices of goods in shops. A
plethora of alternatives, formal and informal flourished in an attempt to keep
people informed of price increases. A personal favorite was called the Ugi’s index, started by an American
ex-pat that charted the price increase of the price of a pizza from a pizza
chain of dubious quality in Buenos Aires.
In a fashion prevalent in some South American countries,
which the Kirchners have their own virulent brand of, they begun to find
measures to prevent the publication of alternative inflation indexes. Cristina
enacted laws that prosecuted individuals and organizations that published
inflation statistics that were not INDEC’s with six-figure fines. No matter how
much of merit these alternative statistics were, in a sense it was a crack down
on the freedom of information and thus a furor has ensued ever since with the
Economist refusing to post INDEC’s statistics in its paper and a “yellow-card” from the IMF, much to the delight
of Kirchneristas, the name given to supporters of Cristina. Only a number of
members of the federal Congress post monthly statistics under the protection of
Congressional immunity such is the situation right now.
The slide in the price of the Argentine peso since last year |
The ratcheting up of the printing presses is at times a sign
of economic mismanagement and the beginning of failure of the economic policies
of a nation that is involved in it. To many that seems to be the case in
Argentina with increased money flight and growing demand for more stable
dollars. To prevent this the government has imposed restrictions on buying dollars and taking them out of the country,
resulting in sniffer dogs at ports and airports on the hunt for large
quantities of foreign currency on a person and the return of that truly
Argentino situation of parallel exchange rates. Although Argentinos now have to inform the state revenue
commission if they plan to go abroad and buy dollars for the trip and have to
endure a mandatory 15% credit card surcharge on all purchases outside the
country the president refuses to say that such actions are in fact restrictions. It is in Cristina’s opinion a
process to de-dollarize the economy and start getting people thinking and using
pesos in a country where all major transactions from cars to houses are
denominated in dollars.
However one must ask why now? With almost ten years of
Kirchner presidents why is the process being implemented over the past few
months and seemingly haphazardly? To Kirchneristas it is the natural
progression of an economic process begun under Nestor to rebuild confidence in
the peso but to others it is a sign of desperation as people lose confidence in
the Argentine economy. It doesn’t help that the peso has been on a continuous yet slow slide in price against the dollar,
bringing back bad memories of 2002 and the end of the currency peg. It seems
that the cogs are coming off the machine that Nestor and Cristina have built
and that the newly-printed 100 peso note will lose even more value. To some it could result in the next economic crisis in Argentina. Looks like
there will be more Evitas in my pocket than I expected before.
No comments:
Post a Comment