It really is beginning to resemble a scene out of a high
school movie. Time and again the big jock Ryanair comes up to the proper girl
Aer Lingus: “Girl I’m the full package. I’ll make you feel good!”, all the time posturing like a safari animal at its
potential mate. The girl snaps back that she is way too worthy to be wasted on
with some big guy like him while all the time looking for that white knight to
confront the jock and sweep her off her feet. However the jock just won’t get the
hint and continues the pursuit while all the time the girl waits for her
rescuer. What is one to make of it all and what will be the outcome? That is
again the question we are asking ourselves these past few weeks as Ryanair
makes yet another bid for its domestic rival Aer Lingus.
I shall first make an admission. Anyone who knows me is well
aware of my distaste for Ryanair. While I give it respect for its prowess and
vicious pursuit of markets and revenue, I just would prefer to fly someone, anyone other them. While Ryanair’s
business model is admirable, cutting the costs to the bone, the incessant
additional charges and penalties makes life confusing and frustrating. It has
led in many cases to a narrowing in the gap of flight prices between the Irish
no-frills airline and other airlines on numerous destinations. While once the
vast discrepancy in price between Ryanair and airlines such as Aer Lingus meant
it was sensible to take the former, more often than not it is no longer the
case.
For this reason I would like choice going somewhere, that
being with or without Ryanair. This is not just an issue of taste and comfort but
a healthy means of fostering competition. For many in Ireland you have just one
alternative to Ryanair and that being Aer Lingus. On flights between Dublin
Airport and Europe, both airlines constitute an 80% share of traffic. This
share is even higher in the other major airports in the Republic such as Cork
and Shannon. It is without doubt a significant amount, which if under the
control of one company would constitute a virtual monopoly. This would not only
create a monopoly on air traffic on many destinations but for an island nation
like Ireland an enduring, dominant control on travel in and out of the country.
Previous attempts to take control of Aer Lingus by Ryanair
have for this reason been struck down by the government, who have a controlling
stake. Competition authorities, domestically and in Brussels have also ruled
against any form of merger. Furthermore Aer Lingus has always declined every
offer by Ryanair as undervaluing the company and its future potential. This
lady is not to be taken.
So why is the situation different now? There are a few
reasons, two of which feel like a game of poker. First of all Ryanair can scent
blood from a financially wounded government. Shorn of its fiscal independence
under the bailout by the Troika of the EU, IMF and EU Commission and mandated
to divest of stakes in companies, Ryanair sees that the coalition has a weak
hand compared to before. The government in the airline’s opinion will sooner
rather than later have no other choice to sell to whoever is interested, even
if it is Ryanair. Second of all it sees this new offer as a way of smoking out
other potential suitors lurking in the dark. This seems to be in relation to
Abu Dhabi’s Etihad, which controls less than 5% of Aer Lingus shares but is
increasing its co-operation with the airline. Ryanair has seen how Etihad has
over the years increased its stake in Ryanair rival Air Berlin and fears a
repeat with Aer Lingus.
However the main argument from the Ryanair camp this time is
something completely different. It has advocated a tie-up with Aer Lingus as
part of a necessary and unrelenting movement towards consolidation between
multiple European airlines, which will benefit the industry and customers.
Ryanair feels that it would be in the best interests of both companies and the
country to tie-up. It points out to recent events in this regard, such as
British Airways merging with Iberia, Air France with KLM and Lufthansa buying
Swiss.
The major issue against this argument is that in virtually
all these consolidations bar British Airways buying out BMI last year, they
have been cross-border. There has been no precedent for the kind of purchase
envisaged with Ryanair buying Aer Lingus. The issue of competition within the
domestic Irish market continues and considering the economic situation, enticing
other airlines to fly from airports in the Republic and creating new
competition is slim to non-existent. Many would in fact be too fearful
considering Ryanair’s history in relation to snuffing out rivals on many
routes. Even if Ryanair promises to keep the two entities as separate with their
respective business models as Michael O’ Leary has advocated, it is still not in
the interests of competition.
It is however in the interest of the country and the
government to refuse this recent offer by Ryanair for Aer Lingus. While Ryanair
may think the government has a weak hand, in fact it has the opposite. Positive
signals about more independence in fiscal policy by the Troika means the
government may not have to divest of its stake in Aer Lingus right now, if at
all. Aer Lingus has also begun to tackle structural weaknesses such as its
pension deficit and also realized a profit of close to 50m euro in the last
financial year. This should stand some way in the government’s favor in keeping
a controlling stake in the company compared to other industries in which it
holds a significant share of the market such as energy and forestry
Furthermore,
advocating the Troika’s stance on increasing competition in the domestic market
to foster growth, it can argue that a tie-up between the two airlines would
create the opposite of that in relation to air travel. Finally, people should
have the choice of the kind of air travel they want, whether it be the basic
no-frills style of Ryanair or the more comfortable Aer Lingus. If this third
attempt fails to succeed, maybe Ryanair should finally take the hint and move
on.
No comments:
Post a Comment